Jump to content

40 Anos do Protocolo FTP

Recommended Posts

FTP 40 Years Old Today . . .

April 16th, 2011 · No Comments

This year is certainly the year for birthdays. The File Transfer Protocol, otherwise known as FTP is 40 years old today. Originally put forth as the RFC 114 Specification on April 16, 1971, FTP (and the various iterations inspired from it) is as heavily used today as it was back then by people and companies all over the world.

Originally put forth as RFC 114 and used as such from 1971 to 1980, it changed when in 1980 it was put forth again as RFC 765 by Jon Postel of ITI. This standard retired RFC 114 and introduced more concepts and conventions that survive to this day, including: A formal architecture for separate client/server functions and two separate channels, Site-to-site transfers, Passive (a.k.a. “firewall friendly”) transfer mode among other improvements. RFC 765 was replaced by RFC 959, which formalized directory navigation in 1985.

The third and current generation of FTP was a reaction to two technologies that RFC 959 did not address: SSL/TLS and IPv6. It was essentially a security upgrade to FTP.

The latest RFC’s that handle the FTP protocol are RFC 2228 in 1997 (which added SSL extensions and is how FTP became FTPS) and RFC 2428, which added IPv6 suport in 1998.

While FTP matured into FTPS, it is not to be confused with SFTP.

FTPS is essentially a secured or hardened FTP protocol that uses two channels, one for the data transfer and one for directory listings and other data not associated with the actual transfer. It’s FTP + SSL.

SFTP is a complete departure from FTP and is part of the Secure Shell File Transfer Project and was built from the ground up as an extension of SSH. It is a secured file transfer protocol built as an extension of SSH itself. While many confuse SFTP with “an FTP session through SSH”, it isn’t. While FTPS is FTP with security extensions (namely SSL), SFTP is an extension of SSH that adds easy file transfer capabilities to the already secure SSH session. Also not to be confused with SCP, SFTP allows for many more dynamic commands than that of simple SCP.

It is interesting to note that many companies still use classic FTP over VPN connections as well.

Anyone lost yet? Just checking . . .

For the record, I prefer SFTP, since I love SSH and do everything I can over SSH, even mapping file systems over it with SSHFS (more info about SSHFS here).

(...in Lyle Backenroth blog)

"A paciência é uma das coisas que se aprendeu na era do 48k" O respeito é como a escrita de código, uma vez perdido, dificilmente se retoma o habito"

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.