Jump to content
  • Revista PROGRAMAR: Já está disponível a edição #60 da revista programar. Faz já o download aqui!


Internet freedom and security

Recommended Posts


a guerra da liberdade da Internet... vejam por vós...

antes apresento um Link para o discurso da Hilary Cliton sobre a liberdade da Internet... vale a pena ver pois é um discuyr


Remarks on Internet Freedom

Hillary Rodham Clinton


e agora o artigo

and pointed the finger at China.

Then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a few "Remarks on Internet Freedom" in which she pushed for one Internet, without barriers.

Separately, the Federal Trade Commission notified about 100 companies that some of their secrets had been exposed by employees who were running peer-to-peer software.

Finally the Internet security firm NetWitness said that it had figured out that 75,000 computers at 2,500 companies had been compromised with the ZeuS Trojan starting in 2008.

Nope - not a good start to 2010. I would like to think that things will quiet down some for the rest of the year but it does not look like that will happen.

In early January, Google announced that it had been hacked from China, that the hackers seemed to be after the gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists and that Google was going to review "feasibility of our business operations in China."

Well, that caused quite a splash. Google's accusation fit so well with the general public perception of China's approach to the Internet that it was easy to assume that the hacking was directed by the Chinese government.

Clinton did not go quite so far as to accuse the Chinese government of complicity during her speech on Internet freedom,but she did call upon it to "conduct a thorough review" of the Google hacks and that the results of the review be transparent. Clinton's speech was quite a good one from the point of view of those of us who value the positive impact of the communication enabled by the Internet.

Properly, she did not hide the fact that communication over the Internet can be used for good (human rights activists) and evil (terrorists).

But she said that "this issue isn't just about information freedom; it is about what kind of world we want and what kind of world we will inhabit. It's about whether we live on a planet with one Internet, one global community, and a common body of knowledge that benefits and unites us all, or a fragmented planet in which access to information and opportunity is dependent on where you live and the whims of censors."

She, clearly, was on the side of one Internet.

Meanwhile, ex-NSA director Mike McConnell, writing in the Washington Post, had a different take. He said that "we need to reengineer the Internet to make attribution, geolocation, intelligence analysis and impact assessment -- who did it, from where, why and what was the result -- more manageable."

Mais em:



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


Important Information

By using this site you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.